Most students think my reasons for this rule include negative experiences in the past when students made wrong use of technology. There’s a bit of truth to that. I’ve seldom had students make wrong use of technology in my classes; however, I have been e-mailed by students while they were in other teachers’ classrooms.
Some students think that I am anti-technology. There’s no truth in that at all. As I noted above, I love technology and try to keep up with it.
The real reason why I ask students to leave technology at the door is I think there are very few places in which we can have deep conversations. Interruptions (中断) by technology often break students’ thoughts and make them depend too much on outside information for ideas. I want students to dig deep in themselves for ideas. I want them to push each other to think differently and to make connections between the course material and the class discussion.
I have been teaching my history class in this way for many years and the evaluations (评价) show student satisfaction with the environment that I create. Students realize with deep conversation and difficult tasks, they learn at a deeper level – a level that helps them keep the course material beyond the classroom.
I am not saying that I won’t ever change my mind about technology use in my history class, but until I hear a really good reason for the change, I will continue my plan. A few hours of technology-free dialogue is just too sweet to give up.
1.The writer’s rule for his History Matters class is ____.
A. discussing historical ideas deeply
B. studying and discussing the materials
C. leaving technology out of the classroom
D. making right use of technology in class
2.The word “negative” in Paragraph 3 means ____.
A. similar B. unforgettable C. special D. unpleasant
3.What can we know from the passage?
A. Students make right use of technology in other teachers’ classes.
B. The classroom is one of the good places to have deep conversations.
C. The writer encourages students to agree with others after discussion.
D. Students are unhappy with the writer’s way of teaching history.
4.The writer wants to tell us that ____.
A. technology has different influences in different classes in college
B. technology makes it difficult to have true communication in class
C. history classes can help students to develop their deep thinking
D. it is time for him to give up his teaching method in history class
1.C
2.D
3.B
4.B
【解析】
试题分析:短文大意:本文介绍了作者教历史课的一种特殊方法,不允许学生在课堂上使用计算机、平板、电话等现代工具而是让他们深入挖掘自己的想法,不要过分依赖外部信息。
1.细节理解题。根据第二段第四句话I have a rule – no computers,ipads,phones,etc可知选C。
2.词义猜测题。根据第二段最后一句when students were told my rules,some of them were not happy并结合该词所在句子便可推知选D。
3.细节理解题。根据第六段末Students realize with deep conversation and difficult tasks, they learn at a deeper level – a level that helps them keep the course material beyond the classroom可知选B。
4.细节理解题。通读短文可知科技使得很难在课堂上有真正的沟通,所以选B。
考点:教育类阅读。
科目:初中英语 来源:2007年浙江省温州市初中毕业生学业考试英语试卷(附答案) 题型:050
|
查看答案和解析>>
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
违法和不良信息举报电话:027-86699610 举报邮箱:58377363@163.com