Question

【题目】Answer the questions（根据短文内容回答下列问题）

In general, laws for children are a good thing. One hundred years ago in industrial countries, children worked 18 hours a day in a factory at age seven. The factory owner could beat a child who fell asleep or was not fast enough. Both parents and teachers could do the same.

Today, there are many laws about children all over the world. Some people think children must obey rules or they should be punished others do not agree. The Inuits or Eskimos in Alaska almost never punish their children. The parents don’t hit them. If the children go too far, the parents punish them by making fun of them.

Children in other parts of the world are not as lucky as Eskimo children. American parents can spank（打……臀部） their children at home, but a teacher cannot hit a child in public school. This is also true in Germany. In contrast（对比）, it is against the law for anyone to hit a child in Sweden. Swedish parents cannot spank their children. The children also have a special government official who works for their rights. There is even a plan for children to divorce from their parents though this is not a law yet！

【1】How were children treated in industrial countries 100 years ago？

________________________________________________________

【2】What does the author mean by “go too far？”

________________________________________________

【3】Can a teacher in Germany hit his students in public school？

_________________________________________________

【4】What kind of people can beat children in Sweden？

_________________________________________

【5】What does it mean by “a plan for children to divorce from their parents？”

________________________________________

【6】How do you think parents in China should educate their children if they don’t behave？

_______________________________________

Answer 1

【答案】

【1】They were treated badly.

【2】Do something improper too much.

【3】No. he can't.

【4】None can do that.

【5】A plan for ending the children’s relationship with their parents.

【6】They should learn from Swedish parents and never beat their children. （合理即可）

【解析】

本文介绍了世界各地有许多关于儿童的法律。有些国家的父母和老师不打孩子们，但是有些国家的父母和老师打孩子们。

【1】根据One hundred years ago in industrial countries, children worked 18 hours a day in a factory at age seven. The factory owner could beat a child who fell asleep or was not fast enough. Both parents and teachers could do the same.可知，在100年前，孩子们很小就在工厂工作很长时间，工厂主人会打孩子们，老师和父母也打孩子们，因此孩子们受到了恶劣地对待。故填They were treated badly.

【2】根据the parents punish them by making fun of them.可知，父母会惩罚他们，因此表示他们做了很多不正确的事，故填Do something improper too much.

【3】根据American parents can spank（打……臀部） their children at home, but a teacher cannot hit a child in public school. This is also true in Germany.可知，在德国，老师不能在公立学校打孩子。因此用否定回答，故填No, he can't.

【4】根据In contrast（对比）, it is against the law for anyone to hit a child in Sweden. Swedish parents cannot spank their children.可知，在瑞典，任何人打小孩都是违法的。瑞典父母不能打孩子屁股。因此在瑞典没有人可以打孩子，故填None can do that.

【5】There is even a plan for children to divorce from their parents though this is not a law yet！表示甚至还有一个让孩子与父母分离的计划，尽管这还不是法律!因此这表示是一个结束孩子和父母关系的计划。故填A plan for ending the children’s relationship with their parents.

【6】根据Swedish parents cannot spank their children.可知，瑞典的父母不打他们的孩子，因此中国的父母，应该向瑞典的父母学习，从来不打他们的孩子们。故填They should learn from Swedish parents and never beat their children.

认真阅读问题，根据问题要求，在文中寻找答案所在的语句或段落，进行分析理解，概括归纳，写出正确的答案。例如小题4，根据In contrast（对比）, it is against the law for anyone to hit a child in Sweden. Swedish parents cannot spank their children.可知，在瑞典，任何人打小孩都是违法的。瑞典父母不能打孩子屁股。因此在瑞典没有人可以打孩子，故填None can do that.