D
Dear Economist,
My newly-wedded wife and I are deeply in love.There is, however, one issue that threatens the happiness of our marriage.I absolutely insist on shopping at Walmart.My wife, meanwhile, would rather avoid Walmart at all costs.
I have recently tried to convince her that not only does Walmart offer the lowest prices known to man, but that the chain is also a force for good―lower prices mean better standards of living for all consumers, increased global trade means a tighter-knit(紧密团结的) international community, and efficient operations translate into higher productivity growth for the economy.My wife complains about poor labour policies, the “fact” that Walmart squeezes suppliers, and that it puts local shops out of business.
Who is right? Will our marriage survive?
Brian Gee
Dear Brian,
I have to agree with you about Walmart.Jason Furman, then an economist at New York University, now an adviser to President Obama, famously argued in 2005 that Walmart was unwittingly (不知不觉地) a progressive success story.The chain’s prices don’t much affect me (I prefer Whole Foods) but Furman estimated that they benefited low-and-middle-income Americans to the sum of around $250 billion a year.
Walmart does not pay much, so it may depress wages.Then again, it may increase wages by offering jobs to the otherwise-unemployed.Either way, the benefits of low prices to Walmart shoppers far outweigh any seemingly reasonable costs to Walmart employees.And while it is true that Walmart employees tend to be poor, the same is true of Walmart shoppers.
Armed with this information you can face your wife with confidence.You are sure to win the conversation.The divorce is likely to be more argued.
Economist
68.What concerns Brian Gee so much that he wrote the letter?
A.His wife refuses to shop at Walmart.
B.They are faced with a divorce.
C.They can’t afford the costs of shopping at Walmart.
D.They are in conflict about shopping at Walmart.
69.Brian Gee’s wife tends to hold the opinion that _________.
A.it is wrong for Walmart to depress its employees’ wages
B.consumers’ lives have improved thanks to Walmart
C.Walmart’s business operation increases productivity in economy
D.Walmart’s business increases global trade
70.What can be inferred from the reply letter?
A.Some employees accept the low pay to keep the job.
B.Walmart appeals to only poor consumers and poor employees.
C.Employees suffer from Walmart’s low prices more than consumers.
D.Jason Furman, a New York University economist, spoke highly of Walmart.
科目:高中英语 来源: 题型:
下面短文中共有10处语言错误。错误涉及一个单词的增加、删除或修改。
增加:在缺词处加上一个漏字符号(∧),并在其下面写出该加的词。
删除:把多余的词用斜线(\)划掉。
修改:在错的词下划一横线,并在该词下面写出修改后的词。
注意: 1. 每处错误及其修改均仅限一词。
2.只允许修改10处,多者(从第11处起)不记分
Dear Sir,
My name is Li Hua. I’d like take the chance for the Two-week Eco-travel Round Australia. I’m a senior two student of 17 in Xi’an. I have a great many of hobbies, such as music, drawing or playing chess. Especially I’m fond of sports and travel. That’s because I’m quite strong and healthy. Australia has long been my dream countries to visit. There’re plenty of interesting plants and animals in that magic country, which were what I want to learn personal. The travel will for sure help increase my knowledge of protect the environment and broaden your horizons. It maybe very tired, but I still apply for the travel.
Yours Li Hua
查看答案和解析>>
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
违法和不良信息举报电话:027-86699610 举报邮箱:58377363@163.com