Question

阅读下面的短文，然后按照要求写一篇150词左右的英语短文。
A former high school teacher who fled his classroom during the massive May 12 earthquake in southwest China has a new job here in a private training school.
Fan Meizhong has a two-year contract with Keyfind Education School in the Haidian District, school spokesman Zhang Wenbin told Xinhua on Wednesday.
The former Chinese language teacher from a private high school in earthquake-hit Dujiangyan City, Sichuan Province, was nicknamed “running Fan” by netizens （网民） after he left his students behind and escaped the classroom as the 8.0-magnitude earthquake struck.
Fan’s behavior became a controversial object, and he was later fired.
Zhang said, however, that Fan had been hired for his extensive teaching experience and talent. At Keyfind, he’ll conduct research on developing students’ potential and raising their interest in learning. He’ll also give some lectures, according to Zhang.
“Fan, as a person, also needs to live,” Zhang said. “We hope the media will be tolerant about Fan and give him some living space. Whether he was wrong or right in his running behavior, we only want to make use of his talent.”
He said the school had not decided what to do next about Fan’s job.
【写作内容】
1. 以约30个词概括短文的要点；
2. 然后以约120个词就“范美忠再被聘为教师”为主题发表你的看法，并包括下列要点：
你是怎样看待范美忠在发生地震时的先跑行为的；
范美忠该不该再聘为教师，为什么？
你心目中的教师该是怎么样的？
【写作要求】
1．作文中可使用实例或其他论述方法支持你的观点，也可以参照阅读材料的内容,
但不得直接引用原文中的句子；
2．作文中不能出现真实姓名和学校名称。
【评分标准】概括准确，语言规范，内容合适，篇章连贯。

Answer 1

 
( Possible version 1 )
The passage is mainly about the news that Fan Meizhong, once a teacher in Dujiangyan City who left his students behind and ran away during the earthquake, again got employed as a teacher in Beijing.
In my opinion, Fan's behavior deserves scolding. According to our law's morality, any grown-up should have the duty to protect teenagers. Therefore, as a teacher, Fan should have helped his helpless students during the earthquake instead of choosing to run away. Although we can understand that it is the instinct that makes Fan escape from the earthquake, he shouldn’t insist that he was a model to be followed. It’s really a shame.
As a result, I think he is not qualified as a teacher anyway, though we should be a little tolerant to give him a chance. If employed as a teacher, he shall set a bad pattern for others.
In my eyes, a teacher should not only be rich in knowledge but also have noble virtue. 

项目	分值	评分标准
概 括	5	按照要求概括了原文的全部主要信息，没有增加与原文无关的信息，没有照抄原文的句子。语言结构正确，行文规范。
	4	基本按照要求概括了原文的主要信息，没有增加与原文无关的信息，没有照抄原文的句子。语言结构正确，行文规范。
	3	基本按照要求概括了原文的主要信息，但包含一些不相关的信息，有个别句子抄自原文。语言结构基本正确，行文比较规范。
	2	不能按照要求概括原文的主要信息，包含较多不相关的信息，有较多的抄袭。语言结构不够准确，行文不够规范。
	0-1	没有按照要求概括原文的主要信息，基本是不相关的信息，大多数句子都抄自原文。语言结构不准确，行文不规范。
写 作	18-20	包含题目所给全部或绝大部分的内容要点。主题明确，内容丰富。 词汇丰富，用词得当。能有效运用合适的语言结构，而且没有（或极少）语法错误。 篇章结构的连贯性好。
	14-17	包含题目所给全部或绝大部分的内容要点。主题明确，个别内容不准确或者不相关。 词汇较丰富，有个别用词错误。较好地运用了合适的语言结构，有少许的语法错误。 篇章结构的连贯性较好。
	11-13	包含题目所给全部或绝大部分的内容要点。主题比较明确，个别内容不准确或者不相关。 词汇较丰富，有个别用词错误。较好地运用了合适的语言结构，有少许的语法错误。 篇章结构的连贯性较好。
	7-10	包含题目所给的部分内容要点。主题基本明确，有些内容不准确或者不相关。 词汇有限，有较多的用词错误。语言结构出现较多的语法错误。 篇章结构的连贯性一般。
	4-6	只包含题目所给的个别内容要点。多数内容不相关或者不准确。文章有些地方照抄源文。 词汇贫乏，有较多的用词错误。大多数的句子出现语法错误。 篇章结构的连贯性差。
	1-3	只包含与题目所给要点内容有关的一些单词。主题不明确，文章基本照抄原文。 词汇极其贫乏，基本不能正确用词。几乎没有正确的句子。篇章结构零乱。
	0	以下几种情况，给0分： 1）完全抄袭原文（或其它文章） 2）文不对题 3）只写一些零散的单词，完全没有表达完整的内容