13．New research finds a link between poverty and poor decision making．The findings may explain why poor people sometimes make bad choices that continue their hardship．
Earlier studies have found the poor less likely to escape poverty．But there has been little research on why the poor make decisions that make their lives harder．Until recently，it was economists who studied poverty，not psychologists．Eldar Shafir，a psychologist in Princeton University says now scientists from both fields work together．Mr．Shafir and his team did two experiments．One took place at a shopping center in New Jersey．Another was carried out among sugar cane farmers in rural India．
The New Jersey experiment involved individuals with low paying jobs and others belonged to the middle class．All the volunteers were asked what they would do if their cars needed repairs．
The volunteers were given two imaginary situations．In the first，the car repairs cost﹩150．In the second，﹩1，500．
"And what we found is that the poor and the rich performed equally well on almost all the tests．"
Not so when the researchers raised the repair costs to﹩1，500．
"Now the poor performed significantly worse．"The poorer lost about 13IQ points on average．This is about the loss experienced when a person has not slept for one night．
The scientists then wondered if the same person reacted differently when he was rich and when he was poor．The Indian sugar cane farmers earn most of their money once a year，when the harvest comes in．But the money often does not last through the year．
"So they find themselves basically rich after the harvest when the income comes in and poor just before the harvest．
The researchers gave them tests similar to the ones taken by the people in New Jersey．They tested the Indian farmers before the harvest and after．
And the results were much the same as with the mall shoppers．
"They performed much more slowly and with many more mistakes when they were poorer than when they were richer．"
Mr．Shafir says the results support 50years of research that shows all humans have limited mental power to deal with things in life．
"And so the insight here is that，having not enough of something in a way makes it harder to make good decisions for everything else．"
61．What is true about earlier studies？B
A．They were done by economists and psychologists．
B．They found it hard for poor people to become rich．
C．They explained why poor people made poor decisions．
D．They showed the poor people cared less about their health．
62．In the first experiment，the poor performed worse becauseC
A．they had not slept for one night
B．it was just an imaginary situation
C．the increased price affected their decision
D．they didn't take the second situation seriously
63．The Indian sugar cane farmersD
A．are smarter when they are poor
B．earn money all through the year
C．earn lots of money so they think they are rich
D．feel rich after the harvest and poor before harvest
64．What do the two experiments have in common？A
A．They got similar findings．
B．They were carried out in the rural areas．
C．They were carried out by economists only．
D．They chose two groups of people with different income．
65．What could be the best title for the passage？C
A．Once poor，always poor？
B．Why are poor people poorer？
C．Poverty weakens brain power．
D．Different experiments，different findings．
分析 文章的大意：人们贫穷时表现得更缓慢，犯的错误更多，当某物不充足时，会更难作出好的决定
解答 61：B 考查细节理解．根据文章第二段的第一句话Earlier studies have found the poor less likely to escape poverty．可知，早期的研究发现贫穷的人不太可能摆脱贫困，由此可知选项B符合题意．
62：C 考查推理判断．根据题干的关键词"the poor performed worse"可将信息定位于文章第六段的内容，从而可知答案选C．
63：D 考查细节理解．根据文章第八段的"they find themselves basically rich after the harvest when the income comes in and poor just before the harvest"可知，答案选D．
64：A 推理判断题 根据The researchers gave them tests similar to the ones taken by the people in New Jersey．They tested the Indian farmers before the harvest and after．And the results were much the same as with the mall shoppers．可知，两个实验的结果相似，故答案为A
65：C 考查主旨大意．根据文章的大意：人们贫穷时表现得更缓慢，犯的错误更多，当某物不充足时，会更难作出好的决定．由此可以得出标题，所以答案选C．
点评 阅读理解题测试考生在阅读基础上的逻辑推理能力，要求考生根据文章所述事件的逻辑关系，对未说明的趋势或结局作出合理的推断；或根据作者所阐述的观点理论，对文章未涉及的现象、事例给以解释．考生首先要仔细阅读短文，完整了解信息，准确把握作者观点．
