He applied to a patent for a new method of removing paint. 题目和参考答案——青夏教育精英家教网—

精英家教网 > 高中英语 > 题目详情

4. He applied to a patent for a new method of removing paint.

4. to → for

题目来源：2016年英语周报高二新课标 > 第48期 2015-2016学年高二课标

练习册系列答案

赢在中考全程优化单元滚动测试卷系列答案

年级	高中课程	年级	初中课程
高一	高一免费课程推荐！	初一	初一免费课程推荐！
高二	高二免费课程推荐！	初二	初二免费课程推荐！
高三	高三免费课程推荐！	初三	初三免费课程推荐！
更多初中、高中辅导课程推荐,点击进入>>

相关习题

科目：高中英语 来源： 题型：

1. The first thing I did was to see if there were any products that might help me,but there only seemed to be powders designed to kill snakes.(P₂)

[分析]

① 本句是一个由but连接的并列复合句。

② 前一分句中thing后跟省略了关系词that的定语从句I did; see后跟由if引导的宾语从句，该宾语从句中又包含由that引导的定语从句，修饰先行词。

③ 后一分句中，过去分词短语designed to kill snakes作后置定语,修饰。

[句意]我所做的第一件事就是看看有没有现成的产品能帮助我，但是，看来只有一种杀蛇的药粉。

[仿写]我所做的第一件事就是看看有没有旅馆能让我舒服地洗个澡，但是,似乎只有一家坐落在街角的小客栈。

查看答案和解析>>

科目：高中英语 来源： 题型：

Genetically modified (GM) foods (转基因食品) have been around for many years. They are developed for a number of different reasons — to fight disease,resist pests,improve nutrition,survive drought — and are mainly found in our food supply in processed foods using com,soybeans and as feed for farm animals. Are they safe? How do they affect the environment? Can they improve food security? Is the world better off with or without GM foods?

Supporters of GM foods say that farmers who grow these crops are able to use fewer environmentally damaging farm chemicals. The increased output is important to feeding the world's growing population. And many studies have shown that GM foods are safe to eat and that there's no actual evidence of any health risks. They also add that the oods have been thoroughly examined and have gamed approval for eating from a wide variety of government and scientific bodies.

Critics,however,are concerned that these foods have not been strictly tested and are potentially dangerous for both the environment and people's health. They say farmers growing GM crops have actually increased their use of farm chemicals. And the widespread use of the crops,they say,has also led to an increase in weeds and insects that have resistance to farm chemicals. And,they argue,there is still no scientific evidence of the long-term safety of these foods.

Four scientists recently took on those questions in a debate,facing off two against two on GM foods. In these Oxford-style debates,the team that gets the most people on its side by the end is the winner.

Before the debate,the audience at the Kaufman Music Center in New York voted 32 percent in favor of GM foods,with 30 percent against and 38 percent undecided. Afterward,60 percent agreed with GM foods,and 31 percent disagreed — making the side arguing in favor of GM foods the winners of this debate.

29. What's the main purpose of Paragraph 1 ?

A. To advertise GM foods.

B. To show what GM foods are.

C. To introduqe the topic of the text.

D. To explain why GM foods are developed.

30. What's the main focus of the debate?

A. The necessity of producing GM foods.

B. Whether GM crops can help to avoid hunger.

C. Whether GM. foods are scientifically examined.

D. GM foods’ effect on human health and the environment.

31. What do we know about the debate at the Kaufman Music Center?

A. There were four votes for the debate.