Question

【题目】Over 500 dogs being delivered to a butcher house were saved by a Chinese animal protection organization. The incident then triggered debate among Chinese netizens about the necessity of pouring so much money and efforts into saving dogs.

On Friday, a truck loaded with over 500 dogs were stopped by volunteers from animal protection organization on Jingha expressway Beijing section. Beijing Times reported these dogs were being delivered to slaughter houses in the city of Changchun, northeast Jilin province and would be eventually served on dinner tables.

After negotiations with the truck driver, pet service provider Leepet Holding Corp. and a philanthropic foundation, Shangshan Foundation, purchased these dogs, each paying 50,000 yuan. Dogs were then delivered to the headquarter of China Small Animal Protection Association (CS APA), being taken care of and waiting for adoption.

After the “dog saving mission” was reported, Chinese net users debate over whether saving dogs worth so much efforts and money while there are still many poor and needy people in China lacking assistance.

Some net users argue the dog saving mission is placing over attention to animals while lots of needy people are still left unattended.

A microblogger “Xiaowulaitajie” said on China’s twitter-like website, weibo.com, “Dogs are saved, adopted and they attracted media spotlight. We'd better spend such money and take such efforts in helping the needy people.”

Another microblogger, Liluping, said "We poured such huge sum of money into saving dogs. I would rather the money be spent on disaster relief."

Some applaud volunteers’ actions and show eagerness of offering their helping hands to those saved dogs.

Still many disapprove those "saving dogs" critics, but they argue that such act nonetheless embodies social progress.

A microblogger named "broken bridge" said, saving dogs does not run counter to taking care of people. Such enthusiasm in public affairs will help raise social awareness in helping the needy.

I think people and animals are created equal .Attention should be paid to people as well as animals.

【1】Where did the article come from ___________?

A. newspaper B. Internet

C. a TV programme D. a magazine

【2】 Whose opinion is closest to the writer's?

A. Some net users' B. Xiaowulaitajie's

C. Liluping's D. Broken bridge's

【3】Which statement is TRUE according to the passage?

A. All the people think it right to save these dogs with so much money.

B. These dogs were finally saved and sent back to their owners.

C. Some volunteers support the actions to save these dogs and the people who offered their helping hands to those saved dogs.

D. 100,000 yuan was given to the truck driver to purchase these dogs.

Answer 1

【答案】

【4】B

【1】D

【2】D

【解析】

试题分析:本文是一篇议论文。讲述的是即将被屠杀的500多只狗狗被中国一家动物保护组织所救，共花费10万买下这批狗狗。这件事件引发了中国网友的热议，不同网友发表不同的意见。作者认为狗和人一样都是平等的，需要给予同等关心。

【4】B细节理解题。根据第一段The incident then triggered debate among Chinese netizens about the necessity of pouring so much money and efforts into saving dogs.可知篇文章来自于网络，因为这个事件引起了中国网民的热议。故选B。

【1】D推理判断题。根据倒数第二段A microblogger named "broken bridge" said, saving dogs does not run counter to taking care of people. Such enthusiasm in public affairs will help raise social awareness in helping the needy.可知一位名叫断桥的博主说拯救狗狗和关心人类是不想违背的，公众的情感将会提高社会意识去帮助需要帮助的人。作者认为狗和人一样都是平等的，需要给予同等关心。故选D。

【2】D推理判断题。根据第三段After negotiations with the truck driver, pet service provider Leepet Holding Corp. and a philanthropic foundation, Shangshan Foundation, purchased these dogs, each paying 50,000 yuan. 可知两个公司分别支付了5万元，两个公司加起来共花费了10万元。故选D。