A. in thought B. in fact C. at once D. as usual 查看更多

 

题目列表(包括答案和解析)

Reading poems is not exactly an everyday activity for most people. In fact, many people never read a poem once they get out of high school.

It is worth reminding ourselves that this has not always been the case in America. In the nine-tenth century, a usual American activity was to sit around the fireside in the evening and read poems aloud. It is true that there was no television at the time, nor movie theaters, nor World Wide Web, to provide diversion. However, poems were a source of pleasure, of self - education, of connection to other people or to the world beyond one ' s own  community. Reading them was a social act as well as an individual one, and perhaps even more social than individual. Writing poems to share with friends and relations was, like reading poems by the fireside, another way in which poetry has a place in everyday life.

How did things change? Why are most Americans no longer comfortable with poetry , and why do most people today think that a poem has nothing to tell them and that they can do well without poems?

There are, I believe, three factors: poets, teachers, and we ourselves. Of these, the least important is the third: the world surrounding the poem has betrayed (背叛) us more than we have betrayed the poem. Early in the twentieth century, poetry in English headed into directions unfavor-able to reading of poetry. Readers decided that poems were not for the fireside or the easy chair at night, and that they belonged where other difficult-to-read things belonged.

Poets failed the reader, so did teachers. They want their students to know something about the skills of a poem, they want their students to see that poems mean something. Yet what usually occurs when teachers push these concerns on their high school students is that young people decide poems are unpleasant crossword puzzles.

 

60. Reading poems is thought to be a social act in the nineteenth century because_________.

   A. it built a like among people               B. it helped unite a community

   C. it was a source of self- education     D. it was a source of pleasure

61. The underlined word “diversion” most probably means “__________”.

   A. concentration     B. change    C. amusements    D. stories

62. According to the passage, what is the main cause of the great gap between readers and poetry?

A. Students are becoming less interested in poetry

B. Students are poorly educated in high school

C. TV and the Intemet are more attractive than poetry

D. Poems have become difficult to understand

63. In the last paragraph, the writer questions__________.

A. the difficulty in studying poems           B. the way poems are taught in school

C. students' wrong ideas about poetry      D. the techniques used in writing poem

查看答案和解析>>

Reading poems is not exactly an everyday activity for most people.In fact, many people never read a poem once they get out of high school.

It is worth reminding ourselves that this has not always been the case in America.In the nineteenth century, a usual American activity was to sit around the fireside in the evening and read poems aloud.It is true that there was no television at the time, nor movie theaters, nor World Wide Web, to provide diversion.However, poems were a source of pleasure, of self-education, of connection to other people or to the world beyond one’s own community.Reading them was a social act as well as an individual one, and perhaps even more social than individual.Writing poems to share with friends and relations was, like reading poems by the fireside, another way in which poetry has a place in everyday life.

How did things change? Why are most Americans no longer comfortable with poetry, and why do most people today think that a poem has nothing to tell them and that they can do well without poems?

There are, I believe, three factors:poets, teachers, and we ourselves.Of these, the least important is the third: the world surrounding the poem has betrayed us more than we have betrayed the poem.Early in the twentieth century, poetry in English headed into directions unfavorable to the reading of poetry.Readers decided that poems were not for the fireside or the easy chair at night, and that they belonged where other difficult-to-read things belonged.

Poets failed the reader, so did teachers.They want their students to know something about the skills of a poem, they want their students to see that poems mean something. Yet what usually occurs when teachers push these concerns on their high school students is that young people decide poems are unpleasant crossword puzzles.

53. Reading poems is thought to be a social act in the nineteenth century because___________.

A. it built a link among people                                 B. it helped unite a community

C. it was a source of self-education                           D. it was a source of pleasure

54. The underlined word “diversion” most probably means “___________”.

A. concentration            B. change                            C. amusements              D. stories

55. According to the passage, what is the main cause of the great gap between readers and poetry?

A. Students are becoming less interested in poetry.

B. Students are poorly educated in high school.

C. TV and the Internet are more attractive than poetry.

D. Poems have become difficult to understand.

56. In the last paragraph, the writer question___________.

A. the difficulty in studying poems               B. the way poems are taught in school

C. students’ wrong ideas about poetry              D. the techniques used in writing poem

查看答案和解析>>

D

Reading poems is not exactly an everyday activity for most people.In fact, many people never read a poem once they get out of high school.

It is worth reminding ourselves that this has not always been the case in America.In the nineteenth century, a usual American activity was to sit around the fireside in the evening and read poems aloud.It is true that there was no television at the time, nor movie theaters, nor World Wide Web, to provide diversion.However, poems were a source of pleasure, of self-education, of connection to other people or to the world beyond one’s own community.Reading them was a social act as well as an individual one, and perhaps even more social than individual.Writing poems to share with friends and relations was, like reading poems by the fireside, another way in which poetry has a place in everyday life.

How did things change? Why are most Americans no longer comfortable with poetry, and why do most people today think that a poem has nothing to tell them and that they can do well without poems?

There are, I believe, three factors:poets, teachers, and we ourselves.Of these, the least important is the third: the world surrounding the poem has betrayed us more than we have betrayed the poem.Early in the twentieth century, poetry in English headed into directions unfavorable to the reading of poetry.Readers decided that poems were not for the fireside or the easy chair at night, and that they belonged where other difficult-to-read things belonged.

Poets failed the reader, so did teachers.They want their students to know something about the skills of a poem, they want their students to see that poems mean something. Yet what usually occurs when teachers push these concerns on their high school students is that young people decide poems are unpleasant crossword puzzles.

53. Reading poems is thought to be a social act in the nineteenth century because___________.

A. it built a link among people                                 B. it helped unite a community

C. it was a source of self-education                           D. it was a source of pleasure

54. The underlined word “diversion” most probably means “___________”.

A. concentration            B. change                            C. amusements              D. stories

55. According to the passage, what is the main cause of the great gap between readers and poetry?

A. Students are becoming less interested in poetry.

B. Students are poorly educated in high school.

C. TV and the Internet are more attractive than poetry.

D. Poems have become difficult to understand.

56. In the last paragraph, the writer question___________.

A. the difficulty in studying poems               B. the way poems are taught in school

C. students’ wrong ideas about poetry              D. the techniques used in writing poem

查看答案和解析>>

  Reading poems is not exactly an everyday activity for most people.In fact, many people never read a poem once they get out of high school.

  It is worth reminding ourselves that this has not always been the case in America.In the nineteenth century, a usual American activity was to sit around the fireside in the evening and read poems aloud.It is true that there was no television at the time, nor movie theaters, nor World Wide Web, to provide diversion.However, poems were a source of pleasure, of self-education, of connection to other people or to the world beyond one’s own community.Reading them was a social act as well as an individual one, and perhaps even more social than individual.Writing poems to share with friends and relations was, like reading poems by the fireside, another way in which poetry has a place in everyday life.

  How did things change?Why are most Americans no longer comfortable with poetry, and why do most people today think that a poem has nothing to tell them and that they can do well without poems?

  There are, I believe, three factors:poets, teachers, and we ourselves.Of these, the least important is the third:the world surrounding the poem has betrayed us more than we have betrayed the poem.Early in the twentieth century, poetry in English headed into directions unfavorable to the reading of poetry.Readers decided that poems were not for the fireside or the easy chair at night, and that they belonged where other difficult-to-read things belonged.

  Poets failed the reader, so did teachers.They want their students to know something about the skills of a poem, they want their students to see that poems mean something.Yet what usually occurs when teachers push these concerns on their high school students is that young people decide poems are unpleasant crossword puzzles.

(1)

Reading poems is thought to be a social act in the nineteenth century because ________.

[  ]

A.

it built a link among people

B.

it helped unite a community

C.

it was a source of self-education

D.

it was a source of pleasure

(2)

The underlined word“diversion”most probably means“________”.

[  ]

A.

concentration

B.

change

C.

amusements

D.

stories

(3)

According to the passage, what is the main cause of the great gap between readers and poetry?

[  ]

A.

Students are becoming less interested in poetry.

B.

Students are poorly educated in high school.

C.

TV and the Internet are more attractive than poetry.

D.

Poems have become difficult to understand.

(4)

In the last paragraph, the writer questions ________.

[  ]

A.

the difficulty in studying poems

B.

the way poems are taught in school

C.

students’ wrong ideas about poetry

D.

the techniques used in writing poem

查看答案和解析>>

阅读理解

  Reading poems is not exactly an everyday activity for most people.In fact, many people never read a poem once they get out of high school.

  It is worth reminding ourselves that this has not always been the case in America.In the nineteenth century, a usual American activity was to sit around the fireside in the evening and read poems aloud.It is true that there was no television at the time, nor movie theaters, nor World Wide Web, to provide diversion.However, poems were a source of pleasure, of self-education, of connection to other people or to the world beyond one’s own community.Reading them was a social act as well as an individual one, and perhaps even more social than individual.Writing poems to share with friends and relations was, like reading poems by the fireside, another way in which poetry has a place in everyday life.

  How did things change?Why are most Americans no longer comfortable with poetry, and why do most people today think that a poem has nothing to tell them and that they can do well without poems?

  There are, I believe, three culprits(肇事者):poets, teachers, and we ourselves.Of these, the least important is the third:the world surrounding the poem has betrayed us more than we have betrayed the poem.Early in the twentieth century, poetry in English headed into directions unfavorable to the reading of poetry.Readers decided that poems were not for the fireside or the easy chair at night, that they belonged where other difficult-to-read things belonged.

  Poets failed the reader, so did teachers.They want their students to know something about the skills of a poem, they want their students to see that poems mean something.Yet what usually occurs when teachers push these concerns on their high school students is that young people decide poems are unpleasant crossword puzzles.

(1)

Reading poems is thought to be a social act in the nineteenth century because ________.

[  ]

A.

it built a link among people

B.

it helped unite a community

C.

it was a source of self-education

D.

it was a source of pleasure

(2)

The underlined word“diversion”(in Paragraph 2)most probably means“________”.

[  ]

A.

concentration

B.

change

C.

amusements

D.

stories

(3)

According to the passage, what is the main cause of the great gap between readers and poetry?

[  ]

A.

Students are becoming less interested in poetry.

B.

Students are poorly educated in high school.

C.

TV and the Internet are more attractive than poetry.

D.

Poems have become difficult to understand.

(4)

In the last paragraph, the writer questions ________.

[  ]

A.

the difficulty in studying poems

B.

the way poems are taught in school

C.

students’ wrong ideas about poetry

D.

the techniques used in writing poems

查看答案和解析>>


同步练习册答案